iPad (10th generation) vs iPad Pro (M2)

Compare iPad (10th generation) and iPad Pro (M2): display, weight and key specifications. Exact configurations, sources and Difluma's interactive comparison.

iPad (10th generation)
10.9″ · 64 GB

iPad Pro (M2)
11″ · 128 GB

Change configurations and see charts →

Key differences

Specification comparison
FeatureiPad (10th generation)iPad Pro (M2)
ChipA14 BionicM2
Screen size10.86″11″
Resolution2360 × 16402388 × 1668
SDR brightness500 nits600 nits
Weight477 g466 g
CPU cores68
GPU cores410
RAM4 GB8 GB
Storage64 GB128 GB
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Display typeLCDLCD
Hardware ray tracingNoNo
Wi-Fi66E
Bluetooth5.25.3

Considering an upgrade

iPad Pro (M2) scores approximately 27% higher in the single-core test (Geekbench 7 Single-Core): 1846 versus 2353.

iPad Pro (M2) scores approximately 126% higher in the multi-core test (Geekbench 7 Multi-Core): 4410 versus 9966.

Score differences help compare the selected configurations. Application speed depends on the workload; these percentages do not imply the same FPS increase or time saving in every task.

Screen diagonals are 10.86″ and 11″. iPad Pro (M2) has the larger display, useful when space for spreadsheets, documents or multiple windows matters. This comparison covers the stated sizes; a different chassis size may change the conclusion.

Display refresh rates reach 60 and 120 Hz. iPad Pro (M2) supports the higher rate, relevant to scrolling and animations; it does not by itself guarantee that frame rate in games.

iPad (10th generation) weighs 477 g and iPad Pro (M2) weighs 466 g. The 11 g difference is small and is unlikely to be a decisive upgrade reason on its own.

Specified maximum SDR brightness is 500 and 600 nits, higher on iPad Pro (M2). Consider this in bright ambient light. HDR brightness is a separate specification.

This table covers the configurations shown; other screen sizes and capacities may differ. Specifications come from the project catalog, with original sources linked below.

Sources and methodology

Related comparisons