iPad mini (6th generation) vs iPad Pro (M4)

Compare iPad mini (6th generation) and iPad Pro (M4): display, weight and key specifications. Exact configurations, sources and Difluma's interactive comparison.

iPad mini (6th generation)
8.3″ · 64 GB

iPad Pro (M4)
11″ · 256 GB

Change configurations and see charts →

Key differences

Specification comparison
FeatureiPad mini (6th generation)iPad Pro (M4)
ChipA15 BionicM4
Screen size8.3″11.1″
Resolution2266 × 14882420 × 1668
SDR brightness500 nits1000 nits
Weight293 g444 g
CPU cores69
GPU cores510
RAM4 GB8 GB
Storage64 GB256 GB
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Display typeLCDTandem OLED
Hardware ray tracingNoYes
Wi-Fi66E
Bluetooth5.05.3

Considering an upgrade

iPad Pro (M4) scores approximately 68% higher in the single-core test (Geekbench 7 Single-Core): 1905 versus 3209.

iPad Pro (M4) scores approximately 165% higher in the multi-core test (Geekbench 7 Multi-Core): 4993 versus 13237.

Score differences help compare the selected configurations. Application speed depends on the workload; these percentages do not imply the same FPS increase or time saving in every task.

Screen diagonals are 8.3″ and 11.1″. iPad Pro (M4) has the larger display, useful when space for spreadsheets, documents or multiple windows matters. This comparison covers the stated sizes; a different chassis size may change the conclusion.

Display refresh rates reach 60 and 120 Hz. iPad Pro (M4) supports the higher rate, relevant to scrolling and animations; it does not by itself guarantee that frame rate in games.

iPad mini (6th generation) is 151 g lighter (293 versus 444 g). That is a concrete advantage when carrying the device frequently, and usually matters less at a desk.

Specified maximum SDR brightness is 500 and 1000 nits, higher on iPad Pro (M4). Consider this in bright ambient light. HDR brightness is a separate specification.

This table covers the configurations shown; other screen sizes and capacities may differ. Specifications come from the project catalog, with original sources linked below.

Sources and methodology

Related comparisons